This article, is worth reading. It’s excerpt from What We See When We Read, by Peter Mendelsund. Click on the link below for more :
http://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2014/08/14/what-we-see-when-we-read/
"Most authors (wittingly, unwittingly) provide their
fictional characters with more behavioral than physical description. Even if an
author excels at physical description, we are left with shambling concoctions
of stray body parts and random detail (authors can’t tell us everything). We
fill in gaps. We shade them in. We gloss over them."
* * *
"Literary characters are physically vague—they have only a
few features, and these features hardly seem to matter—or, rather, these
features matter only in that they help to refine a character’s meaning.
Character description is a kind of circumscription. A character’s features help
to delineate their boundaries—but these features don’t help us truly picture a
person."
* * *
"It is precisely what the text does not elucidate that
becomes an invitation to our imaginations. So I ask myself: Is it that we
imagine the most, or the most vividly, when an author is at his most elliptical
or withholding?"
***
"Though we may think of characters as visible, they are more
like a set of rules that determines a particular outcome. A character’s
physical attributes may be ornamental, but their features can also contribute
to their meaning."
No comments:
Post a Comment